Stock Based Compensation
A non-cash expense representing employee pay in the form of equity, which impacts net income but is added back to calculate operating cash flow.
Stock-based compensation (SBC) is a form of employee remuneration where payment is made in equity (company shares or rights to shares) instead of cash. Common forms include stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs). The primary goals are to motivate employees by aligning their interests with shareholders and to conserve cash, which is especially important for startups. Under accounting rules, SBC is treated as an expense, but because it doesn't use cash, it receives special treatment on the cash flow statement.
How Stock-Based Compensation is Accounted For
Even though no cash is paid out, stock-based compensation is recorded as an expense on the income statement. When a company grants stock to employees, the estimated fair value of that equity is recognized as a compensation expense, which reduces the company’s net income just like a cash salary would. This expense is typically embedded within operating expense categories like R&D or SG&A, rather than being a standalone line item.
This accounting treatment reflects the view that giving away equity is a real economic cost to the company's owners. However, because no money leaves the company's bank account, it is classified as a non-cash expense. This distinction is critical for understanding its treatment on the statement of cash flows.
Treatment on the Cash Flow Statement
On the cash flow statement (using the indirect method), stock-based compensation appears in the Operating Activities section. Since SBC reduced net income but didn’t actually use any cash, it is added back to net income in the reconciliation. This adjustment reverses the non-cash accounting expense to avoid understating the company's true operating cash flow.
The Rationale: No Cash Outlay, So It's Added Back
The core principle is that expenses not involving cash must be added back to net income to arrive at the actual cash generated. The company paid with a piece of its ownership, not its cash reserves. Failing to add SBC back would incorrectly penalize the company's cash flow for an expense that didn't drain cash. This is the same logic used for adding back depreciation and amortization.
Impact on Analysis: Cash Flow vs. Shareholder Dilution
Stock-based compensation has a crucial dual impact that analysts must consider:
- Boosts Operating Cash Flow: Since SBC is added back, it can make a company’s cash-generating ability appear stronger relative to its reported net income. Many high-growth tech companies report low or negative net income but have positive operating cash flow, largely thanks to heavy use of stock compensation.
- Causes Shareholder Dilution: The positive cash flow effect comes at a cost. Paying employees with new shares increases the total number of shares outstanding, which dilutes the ownership stake of existing shareholders. Over time, heavy SBC can significantly erode per-share value if not offset by stock buybacks.
Because of this trade-off, some analysts argue that for valuation purposes, SBC should be treated as a cash expense by subtracting it from operating cash flow to reflect its true economic cost to shareholders.
Reporting in Practice: GAAP vs. Non-GAAP
It is common, especially in the tech sector, for companies to report non-GAAP profit metrics that exclude stock-based compensation. This practice makes their earnings appear higher than the GAAP-compliant figure.
Example: Zscaler (Fiscal 2022)
While useful for understanding cash profitability, investors must remember that this non-GAAP view ignores the real cost of shareholder dilution.
Disclosure and a Real-World Example
Companies are required to provide detailed disclosures about their SBC programs in the footnotes to their financial statements. These notes explain the total expense, the types of awards granted, and the valuation methods used.
Example: Amazon (2017)
Key Takeaways
Stock-based compensation is a non-cash expense where employees are paid with equity (e.g., stock options, RSUs) instead of cash.
It reduces net income on the income statement but is added back in the Operating Activities section of the cash flow statement because no cash was actually spent.
This add-back often causes operating cash flow to be significantly higher than net income, especially for technology and growth companies.
While SBC conserves cash for the company, its primary drawback is that it dilutes the ownership stake of existing shareholders.
Companies provide detailed disclosures in their financial statement footnotes, and many also report non-GAAP earnings that exclude SBC, which can present a more favorable, albeit incomplete, view of profitability.
Stock Based Compensation
A non-cash expense representing employee pay in the form of equity, which impacts net income but is added back to calculate operating cash flow.
Stock-based compensation (SBC) is a form of employee remuneration where payment is made in equity (company shares or rights to shares) instead of cash. Common forms include stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs). The primary goals are to motivate employees by aligning their interests with shareholders and to conserve cash, which is especially important for startups. Under accounting rules, SBC is treated as an expense, but because it doesn't use cash, it receives special treatment on the cash flow statement.
Table of Contents
How Stock-Based Compensation is Accounted For
Even though no cash is paid out, stock-based compensation is recorded as an expense on the income statement. When a company grants stock to employees, the estimated fair value of that equity is recognized as a compensation expense, which reduces the company’s net income just like a cash salary would. This expense is typically embedded within operating expense categories like R&D or SG&A, rather than being a standalone line item.
This accounting treatment reflects the view that giving away equity is a real economic cost to the company's owners. However, because no money leaves the company's bank account, it is classified as a non-cash expense. This distinction is critical for understanding its treatment on the statement of cash flows.
Treatment on the Cash Flow Statement
On the cash flow statement (using the indirect method), stock-based compensation appears in the Operating Activities section. Since SBC reduced net income but didn’t actually use any cash, it is added back to net income in the reconciliation. This adjustment reverses the non-cash accounting expense to avoid understating the company's true operating cash flow.
The Rationale: No Cash Outlay, So It's Added Back
The core principle is that expenses not involving cash must be added back to net income to arrive at the actual cash generated. The company paid with a piece of its ownership, not its cash reserves. Failing to add SBC back would incorrectly penalize the company's cash flow for an expense that didn't drain cash. This is the same logic used for adding back depreciation and amortization.
Impact on Analysis: Cash Flow vs. Shareholder Dilution
Stock-based compensation has a crucial dual impact that analysts must consider:
- Boosts Operating Cash Flow: Since SBC is added back, it can make a company’s cash-generating ability appear stronger relative to its reported net income. Many high-growth tech companies report low or negative net income but have positive operating cash flow, largely thanks to heavy use of stock compensation.
- Causes Shareholder Dilution: The positive cash flow effect comes at a cost. Paying employees with new shares increases the total number of shares outstanding, which dilutes the ownership stake of existing shareholders. Over time, heavy SBC can significantly erode per-share value if not offset by stock buybacks.
Because of this trade-off, some analysts argue that for valuation purposes, SBC should be treated as a cash expense by subtracting it from operating cash flow to reflect its true economic cost to shareholders.
Reporting in Practice: GAAP vs. Non-GAAP
It is common, especially in the tech sector, for companies to report non-GAAP profit metrics that exclude stock-based compensation. This practice makes their earnings appear higher than the GAAP-compliant figure.
Example: Zscaler (Fiscal 2022)
While useful for understanding cash profitability, investors must remember that this non-GAAP view ignores the real cost of shareholder dilution.
Disclosure and a Real-World Example
Companies are required to provide detailed disclosures about their SBC programs in the footnotes to their financial statements. These notes explain the total expense, the types of awards granted, and the valuation methods used.
Example: Amazon (2017)
Key Takeaways
Stock-based compensation is a non-cash expense where employees are paid with equity (e.g., stock options, RSUs) instead of cash.
It reduces net income on the income statement but is added back in the Operating Activities section of the cash flow statement because no cash was actually spent.
This add-back often causes operating cash flow to be significantly higher than net income, especially for technology and growth companies.
While SBC conserves cash for the company, its primary drawback is that it dilutes the ownership stake of existing shareholders.
Companies provide detailed disclosures in their financial statement footnotes, and many also report non-GAAP earnings that exclude SBC, which can present a more favorable, albeit incomplete, view of profitability.
Related Terms
Apply This Knowledge
Ready to put Stock Based Compensation into practice? Use our tools to analyze your portfolio and explore market opportunities.
This content is also available on our main website for public access.